- 帖子
- 50
|
Reasons for decision
You did not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that:
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the
visa is granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last
substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600
visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
Under policy when considering “any other relevant matter”, decision makers may take
into account a wide range of considerations to determine whether an applicant genuinely
intends a temporary stay in Australia. This may include, but is not limited to, the applicant’s
employment, economic and family circumstances, their credibility, the claimed purpose and
period of stay, and the applicant’s previous travel history.
In assessing these criteria I have taken into account the information provided in your visa
application form and the supporting documents provided. On balance, I find that you have
not demonstrated sufficiently strong employment, economic, family or other commitments in
China that would be sufficient incentive for you to return to China.
More specifically, while you claim to be employed in China, you have not provided sufficient
evidence with your application of a regular salary payment that supports your income and
employment claims. This leads me to have doubts as to your ongoing employment and
overall economic circumstances in China. As such, I do not consider that you have strong
employment or economic incentives to return China at the end of your proposed stay in
Australia.
In light of the above considerations, I am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay
temporarily in Australia for the purpose you have stated, and therefore find that you do not
satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994.
Review rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.
As this letter was sent to you by email, you are taken to have received it at the end of the day
it was transmitted.
Questions about this decision
We cannot consider your visa application any further.
Visa application charge
The visa application charge which has already been paid can only be refunded in limited
circumstances, regardless of the application outcome. |
|